Debunking Open Source Myths

Open-source software (Oss), with its ready code and free price tag, has a multitude of myths surrounding its efficiency and quality. Base myths consist of that it is bad for the economy, Oss products are second rate, and the quality cannot be good because it is free.

The first main myth that Oss is bad for the cheaper and against capitalist principles could not be additional from the truth. Ownership software advocates claim that open-source material takes away large corporations' profits. Although this might be true on a small scale, the whole market is not composed of software giants like Microsoft. In addition, Microsoft's lost earnings comes from users using their products illegally without licenses Without Oss, the social networking surge online would not have occurred so rapidly. Clubs can be built from the ground up with less first start-up money, foremost to diversification and a host of new businesses. Facebook, Twitter, Wordpress, and Joomla have created Oss tools that are changing and enhancing the way population communicate. With improved transportation capabilities, enhanced collaboration occurs on a global scale, which is useful for the worldwide economy.

Apache

Another myth about open-source involves questioning its quality. Many of the top traffic websites like Facebook, Yahoo, YouTube, Wikipedia, and MySpace all use open-source software such as Linux and Apache to run their programs. Major Clubs that use open-source consist of Amazon, Disney, and Boeing. Major computer and software businesses such as Ibm and Hp have also adopted an open-source strategy. Even Microsoft is paying concentration to open-source possibilities, although it is commonly reacting to Oss as a threat rather than a possible avenue for expansion. Microsoft considers some Oss programs, such as Linux, to threaten and violate a whole of its patents, which it has been pursuing in costly litigation. If an ample developer considers free software to be a threat, the quality of Oss is obviously a force to be respected.

Although some open-source programs lack quality and prove to be ineffective at providing solutions, the same situation exists for proprietary, commercial material. Excellent programs exist in both Ownership and Oss domains, but with open-source, the code is facilely available, changeable, and customizable. quality is not diminutive by model whole or delayed by technical support; instead, the only limit on usefulness of open-source products is the developer's ability.

Debunking Open Source Myths